Tuesday, June 30, 2009

Inflating Chávez

Although the coup has popular support in Honduras, it has also allowed Mr. Chávez, who is leading the international response, to claim the moral high ground. The coup leaders, who were trying to prevent Mr. Chávez from bringing Honduras into his fold, may end up giving him more strength in the region.

[Break]

Across the Spanish-language news media, the recurring image of the last two days has been that of Mr. Chávez and his allies working furiously for Honduran democracy.
I disagree, both in the idea that Chávez is unequivocally leading the international response, and that his is the dominant image in the Spanish media. On the latter point, Mexico may offer an unrepresentative portrait, but Chávez, despite his blustering, has received less attention on the matter than Calderón and much less than Zelaya himself. The El Universal editorial hardly mentioned him, and most of the commentary here has been pretty similar in that regard. Chávez has never appeared on the internet headlines of the major newspapers in regard to Honduras. I don't get as much of my news from TV as I do from print, but it hasn't seemed like he was all over the airwaves, either.

In addition, this tendency to view everything that happens in Latin America first and foremost as a chance to either out-maneuver or be out-maneuvered by Chávez inflates his importance. Leadership of the international response is very much a matter of perception, and nothing adds to the perception of Chávez's centrality more than for his political opponents to be hailing it. I'm not denying Chávez's role both in the buildup and reaction to the coup, but this event is not merely round 27 in the US vs. Chávez. Vargas Llosa's take reminds me of the unfortunate Cold War outlook that consigned the region to being primarily a secondary chess board for the USSR and the US for much of the second half of the last century.

Update: This from today's NY Times article on the international reaction:
While Mr. Chávez continued to portray Washington as the coup’s possible orchestrator, others in Latin America failed to see it that way.

“Obama Leads the Reaction to the Coup in Honduras,” read the front-page headline on Tuesday in Estado de São Paulo, one of the most influential newspapers in Brazil, whose ties to Washington are warm.

2 comments:

jd said...

Amen. His op-ed today in the WaPo (really gettin around, this one) is even more aggressive with this theory. Zelaya's clearly little more than an opportunist and the crisis plays into Chavez's hands a bit, but the international conspiracy element of chavismo is generally overwrought. A Chavez-linked candidate has yet to win an election in any country that hadn't undergone total institutional collapse, and the most recent left-of-center entrants - Funes in El Salvador and Lugo in Paraguay - have gone out of their way to disassociate themselves from him (Colom in Guate somewhat fits this as well).

The Vargas Llosas (both father, who's said similar things in recent days, and son) are perhaps overly influenced by events in their home country of Peru that I believe they badly misinterpret. Mario had a very bad piece in the main paper (El Comercio) the other day supporting the international conspiracy take on the indigenous protests there that led to numerous deaths. He's wrong, punto. And Alvaro, for his occasional charms, has always been one of those "hate the oligarchic right, but hate the populist left much more" types. I think it distorts his perspective at times.

The secular trend of chavismo internationally is downward and a brief uptick due to Chavez's current grandstanding will not change that.

(Sorry if this is only semi-coherent it's partially cobbled from something I emailed some people this morning.)

pc said...

I think that might be the first time someone landed on the Times and Post page for a topical issue in one week. Quite the accomplishment. I like Alvaro Vargas Llosa generally, and I probably disagree with him more often than not, but yeah his perspective does seem a little distorted, a little personal here. Maybe it has something to do with what happened in Caracas.

And as far as the international chavismo angle, not only is it overblown, it turns into a self-fulfilling prophecy. If we turn out back on guys like Zelaya who aren't true believers but opportunists, we might not drive them into his arms, but we certainly make Chavez a lot more appealing.