Here's a piece about the wave of killings of journalists in Mexico. Highlights:
More troubling than Calderon’s failure to enact the law is what it
represents: a lack of genuine interest in protecting journalists,
evident across the country at every level of government. (However,
journalists are not alone in this: the fact that roughly 80 percent of all murders
go unsolved demonstrates a lack of interest in justice for victims, of
whatever profession.) As the failure of the special prosecutor
demonstrates, merely adding new agencies into the mix is unlikely to
change anything.
Moreover, while the plan to give investigators an added push and
extra resources to track down those who attack journalists is laudable,
it’s worth noting that the authorities already have all of the legal
tools they need to do this. Anyone convicted of murder faces a lengthy
prison sentence in Mexico. If the local authorities made a point of
concentrating their resources disproportionately on those who attack
reporters, making the conviction rate in such case higher, than criminal
groups facing a journalistic nuisance might think twice before
resorting to violence.
That is, after all, the biggest reason that attacks on journalists,
even when they publish damning information about criminal operations,
are so rare in more developed countries: such crimes place a great deal
of pressure on the government to solve them, which, in turn, makes a
conviction more likely still. In short, it’s not in criminals’ interest
to target reporters.
And
here's a piece following up on the investigation into the arrest of Tomás Yarrington.
No comments:
Post a Comment